[ICOM] How do the Receivers and DSP compare between the 7600, 7700, and 7800?

[Kent Hufford]

The Band Scope on my Flex 3000 is GREAT.

I sold my 756Pro and got a 9100. The DSP is better.  And the roofing filers

But DSTAR on all HF bands on the 9100 is great.

Kent
KQ4KK

-----Original Message-----
From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
Behalf Of bonddaleena at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 3:17 PM
To: icom at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [ICOM] How do the Receivers and DSP compare between the 7600,
7700, and 7800?


I'm waiting on a 9100 "PRO" before I replace my beloved 756PRO, which I
purchased while in Tokyo.......

ron
N4UE






-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Young <k4lxv at bellsouth.net>
To: ICOM Reflector <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tue, Sep 20, 2011 12:31 pm
Subject: Re: [ICOM] How do the Receivers and DSP compare between the 7600,
7700, and 7800?


Roger; The 7700 and 7800 have preselectors in the front end and built in
power 
upplies.. Their transmitters are 200 watts. The 7600 has no preselector and 
ecause of this, also has dual watch like your 756Pro. It has a 100 watt 
ransmitter. All have similar  processors and dsp.The bandscope on the 7600, 
hile not as good as the 7700/7800 is better than the pro series.
B4OJ's web site can provide all the details.
arry K4LXV

----
our Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
com Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
com FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
o support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html