[ICOM] ham radio industry

WW3S ww3s at zoominternet.net
Wed Mar 16 19:13:19 EDT 2011


I didn't mean to imply they were "ok"....they had no serious damage from the 
earthquake but they are fairly close to the reactor in the most 
trouble....depending on the outcome of that will determine whether they are 
"ok"....

On 3/16/2011 6:23:47 PM, Dan Cotsirilos (k9dtc at comcast.net) wrote:
> Yaesu may be ok but does that mean there will no interruption in
> transportation?
>
>
>
>
>
> Dan K9DTC
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Leith
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 5:13 PM
> To: 'ICOM Reflector'
> Subject: Re: [ICOM] ham radio industry
>
> Good to know.  That puts Yaesu's situation is better light.  That's far
> more newsworthy than idle speculation.  Now, what about Icom and Kenwood?
>
> 73
>
> Al, VE1AL
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
> On
> Behalf Of WW3S
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 7:10 PM
> To: icom at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [ICOM] ham radio industry
>
> Yaesu's plant is at Fukishima, and sustained moderate damage to one
> assembly line, the word was all was well, but that was before the nuclear
> plant went awry....
>
> On 3/16/2011 6:07:56 PM, Alan Leith (aleith at syd.eastlink.ca) wrote:
> > Perhaps we first need to know if any of the Japanese ham radio,
> > television,
> >
> > electronics and automobile manufacturers are/were located in the zone
> > where the earthquake struck.  I don't
> know and I 



More information about the Icom mailing list