[ICOM] S Meter on Pro III
Joe Oski
jen1joeo at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 1 10:47:38 EST 2011
Hi Tom,
In my OPINION, don't TRUST either..
There are a lot of RELATIVE aspects of receivers, especially S Meter readings.
There are no published specs.
BTW, Using a step attenuator and signal source,
I have "Ops Checked" my Pro-III S-Meter, Attenuators and Pre-amps several times.
Each S-Unit from S9 down to S-5 is 3 dB. Not the traditional 6 dB.
The internal attenuators agree with the 3 dB per S-Unit response.
The Pre-amp gains also agree with the standard step attenuator.
I enjoy my Pro-III especially the RX..
73
Joe O, KI5FJ
NNNN
--- On Tue, 2/1/11, Thomas F. Giella NZ4O <nz4o at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
From: Thomas F. Giella NZ4O <nz4o at tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: [ICOM] S Meter on Pro III
To: "Icom eList" <icom at mailman.qth.net>, "IC-756 Pro 3 Yahoo" <ic756pro3 at yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2011, 3:03 PM
On my IC-756 Pro III the analog S meter and S meter on the multi function
meter do not agree on the digital modes. The analog always reads a littler
higher than the other.
Which meter should I trust if either?
73 & GUD DX,
Thomas F. Giella, NZ4O
Lakeland, FL, USA
nz4o at tampabay.rr.com
NZ4O Solar Space Weather And Geomagnetic Data Archive: http://www.nz4o.org
NZ4O Daily LF/MF/HF/6M Radiowave Propagation Forecast:
http://www.solarcycle24.org
----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Icom
mailing list