[ICOM] Icom 9100
Adam Farson
farson at shaw.ca
Wed Apr 13 15:28:50 EDT 2011
Hi Paul,
>From what I am seeing on the IC-9100 group, the radio is doing quite well
and none of the new owners are complaining about its packaging. Its
appearance differs from that of the old 746Pro in a number of ways - in
particular, its screen is much larger and its controls are differently laid
out. The rounding of the front-panel edges is in line with other current
Icom radios.
Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
Intra cloacam maximam romanam disparuerunt omnes senatores romani.
-----Original Message-----
From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
Behalf Of paul glassman
Sent: 13-Apr-11 08:00
To: ICOM Reflector
Subject: Re: [ICOM] Icom 9100
I looked at the specs and options on HRO and Universal. It looks like a
terrific rig, however with d-star 1.2 gig and roofing filters $5k?, I dont
know about that. Built in rtty is no major deal. Like I said, it looks like
a nice package, however a ts2000x and computer software for less than $2k
will do about the same. From a marketing standpoint, it looks like an
ic-746. Now I realize it's not, but why would they want to market a $5k rig
that looks like their former 746 that now sells for $700 used. A marketing
blunder. My uneducated expert opinion. 73 Paul
w8jn
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax
si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
More information about the Icom
mailing list