[ICOM] Icom 7700 vs 7600

[Jim]

Having owned both. The 7600 stayed.

73 de ke4wy jim

Sent from my iPod


On Jul 26, 2009, at 10:37 PM, John Geiger <aa5jg at yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> How much better?  I realize that is kind of a subjective question,  
> though.  The 7600 does some with roofing filters as standard, correct?
>
> 73s John AA5JG
>
> --- On Sun, 7/26/09, Dick Flanagan <dick at k7vc.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Dick Flanagan <dick at k7vc.com>
>> Subject: Re: [ICOM] Icom 7700 vs 7600
>> To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
>> Date: Sunday, July 26, 2009, 9:29 PM
>> At 07:24 PM 7/26/2009, John Geiger
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Other than the built in PS and higher RF output, what
>> are the main
>>> differences between the 7700 and the 7600?
>>
>> The 7700 has a better receiver.  The "dual watch"
>> feature will always
>> compromise receiver performance.
>>
>> Dick
>>
>> PS:  The 7700 also has a 200 watt transmitter, but I
>> find that of
>> little value to me.
>> --
>> Dick Flanagan K7VC
>> dick at k7vc.com
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>> To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html