[ICOM] Fw: IC-756PROIII replacement

John Geiger aa5jg at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 21 13:27:20 EST 2009


According to the ad:

"Most remarkably, the IC-7600 realizes the same level of receiver performance as the IC-7700/7800, our top-of-the-line transceivers."

If that is so, shouldn't it cost MORE than the 7700, given that it does dual receive and the 7700 doesn't?  I can see $1000 or more just for a built in PS with the 7700.

73s JOhn AA5JG

--- On Wed, 1/21/09, Paul Playford <paul at w8aef.com> wrote:

> From: Paul Playford <paul at w8aef.com>
> Subject: [ICOM] Fw: IC-756PROIII replacement
> To: "Icom Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
> Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 11:16 AM
> http://www.icom.jp/world/news/090120/index.html
> 
> The USA version does to 60 meters. Note what it says at the
> bottom of the
> page, or lack of it. No mention of the 746 (7400 in
> Europe). I take note of
> this, because the rumor mill says there will be a 7500 to
> replace the 746
> (7400). The 7300 is now the in-house name for what has been
> known as the
> 7000.1, so apparently the 7000 replacement is closer to a
> reality. I suspect
> 8 to 12 months.
> 
> Alan, KØBG
> 
> de Paul, W8AEF
> 
> ZF2JL/ZF2TA  FO8DX/FO8PLA  8Q7AA  XZ0A  VU7RG  TX5C
> 
> 
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC:
> icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/


      



More information about the Icom mailing list