[ICOM] Link to new IC-9100 page.

[Adam Farson]

Hi John,

That was a typo on the web page. I have now corrected it to agree with the
brochure (75W on 430/440 MHz).

Perhaps Kenwood will now freshen up their venerable TS-2000. Don't know
about Motorola.

Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ


-----Original Message-----
From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
Behalf Of John Geiger
Sent: 21-Aug-09 20:55
To: ICOM Reflector
Subject: Re: [ICOM] Link to new IC-9100 page.

The brochure says it does satellites, and it looks like it will do dual
receive.  However, there is some conflicting information on the power
levels.  The brochure sounds better than the website-the brochure says 100
watts on 2m and 75 watts on UHF, just like the Icom 910H.

Thanks for sharing this with us Adam, looks like a winner. Maybe this will
force Yaesu to get off their butts and come out with a satellite rig as well
(and hopefully it will work).

73s John AA5JG

--- On Fri, 8/21/09, Adam Farson <farson at shaw.ca> wrote:

> From: Adam Farson <farson at shaw.ca>
> Subject: [ICOM] Link to new IC-9100 page.
> To: "'ICOM Reflector'" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
> Date: Friday, August 21, 2009, 9:19 PM Here it is, guys. I have been 
> authorised to post the new IC-9100 page.
> 
> http://www.ab4oj.com/icom/ic9100/main.html
> 
> Sorry about the previous misfire!
> 
> Best 73,
> Adam, VA7OJ/AB4OJ
> Moderator, ic9100 Group