[ICOM] ProIII and TX5C
Jan Robbins
swanman at cfu.net
Mon Mar 10 21:00:11 EST 2008
I'd hold on to the 781. The old 775 I had did lots better than a ProIII.
Mike Olbrisch wrote:
> I find that an interesting comment. Perhaps the IC-781 isn't going anywhere for
> a while yet.
>
> Mike - KD9KC.
> El Paso, Tx.
> DM61rt
>
> ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ (Molon labe. [mo-lone lah-veh] Google it)
>
> =============================================
> The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights reserved.
> =============================================
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>> [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jan Robbins
>> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 6:43 PM
>> To: ICOM Reflector
>> Subject: [ICOM] ProIII and TX5C
>>
>> Boy, it is really amazing to see how badly the ProIII's are
>> working on SSB at TX5C. You can see great--top of the
>> world--performance by the CW guys, while the poor SSB guys
>> are sitting around waiting for the AGC to come down to the
>> point where they can hear at least a 20-over signal.
>> CW rates are three to four times the SSB ones or more,
>> because the SSB ops are twiddling their thumbs. I thought
>> this had been shown in any number of previous DXpeditions,
>> but I suppose if you are offered free radios, you take 'em
>> even if they can't do the job. Doesn't ANYONE know what a
>> roofing filter is and why it matters? They would have been
>> better off with 765's.
>>
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Text inserted by Panda IS 2008:
>
> This message has NOT been classified as spam. If it is unsolicited mail (spam), click on the following link to reclassify it: http://localhost:6083/Panda?ID=pav_6858&SPAM=true&path=C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Jan\Local%20Settings\Application%20Data\Panda%20Software\AntiSpam
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
More information about the Icom
mailing list