[ICOM] IC-735

[D C *Mac* Macdonald]

Our club didn't do its own Field Day operation this year,
but we had used one of my 735s for the past six or
seven years.  Simple for  EVERYBODY  to operate,
and as reliable as a rock!

Mac, K2GKK/5



----Original Message Follows----
From: Adam Farson <farson at shaw.ca>
Reply-To: ICOM Reflector <icom at mailman.qth.net>
To: 'ICOM Reflector' <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: RE: [ICOM] IC-735
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:32:04 -0700

Hi Clete,

Up to a point, this true - but the IC-735 has a very noisy synthesiser by
modern standards.

Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ


-----Original Message-----
From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
Behalf Of C Whitaker
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 07:12
To: ICOM Reflector
Subject: [ICOM] IC-735

de WB2CPN
Adam, did someone say the other day that the IC-735 was the best deal around
price and
performance wise?       73  Clete


----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net Icom Users
Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/




Scanned for viruses by Blue Coat
http://www.WinProxy.com/
----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/