[ICOM] What is wrong with SMA?

[John Geiger]

But the CW debate actually had merit.

73s John W5TD


--- Ed Yeary <w4tey at bellsouth.net> wrote:

> IMHO they are fragile and hard to adapt to other
> applications. Adapters have 
> been hard to find and are expensive. Probably due to
> the relative newness of 
> them. Also haven't you heard? Hams don't like change
> !!!!!! Do I need to 
> mention the CW debate? (:]
> 
> Ed Yeary W4TEY
> 325 Cumberland Drive
> Harrogate, TN 37752
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Geiger" <johngeig at yahoo.com>
> To: <icom at mailman.qth.net>; <yaesu at mailman.qth.net>;
> 
> <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 10:19 AM
> Subject: [ICOM] What is wrong with SMA?
> 
> 
> >I have been reading some equipment reviews on a
> > website, and many reviewers complained about an HT
> > having a SMA connector instead of a BNC.  So what
> is
> > wrong with SMA connectors?  I like them better
> than
> > BNC connectors since they are smaller and are just
> as
> > easy to use.
> >
> > 73s John W5TD
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > ----
> > Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC,
> icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> > Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> > Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.7/620 -
> Release Date: 1/8/2007 
> > 4:12 PM
> >
> > 
> 
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC,
> icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com