[ICOM] Pro 3 and 7000 Tests by Sherwood

[John Geiger (NE0P)]

It is interesting that the 756PRO3 has slightly worse performance (probably within margin of error) as compared to the 756PRO.  Can anyone else confirm that they are so close in receiver performance?  Most evidence seems to say otherwise.

73s John NE0P


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Bill Tippett <btippett at alum.mit.edu>
Reply-To: ICOM Reflector <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Date:  Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:36:56 -0500

>         FYI Sherwood recently added
>data for the IC-756 Pro III and IC-7000 to
>his receiver performance test data table:
>
>http://www.sherweng.com/table.html
>
>                         73,  Bill  W4ZV
>
>----
>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
 

________________________________________________________________