[ICOM] PRO2 vs. PRO3
N5NF Watt
WattGee at sbcglobal.net
Tue Jan 17 13:10:44 EST 2006
Hi John, Mine is 4 years old with full output and runs cool. Not enclosed in
a cabinet. Sits on top of my desk. Had a newer one and had the same
problems as you. Good Luck. Watt
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p at lcisp.com>
To: <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:46 AM
Subject: [ICOM] PRO2 vs. PRO3
>I had a 756PRO2 for a little while, and found 2 things I didn't like about
>it:
>
> 1. It ran HOT! Left it on for an hour or so on receive only and it felt
> like most rigs do after running RTTY for awhile.
>
> 2. It wouldn't put out 100 watts on SSB. More like 70 or so. This was
> according to the PO meter on the 756PRO2. The Icom 756 I had did 100
> watts on SSB according to its meter. I know of one other local ham who
> had the same complaint, as it wouldn't drive his amp to full output. I
> suppose it is possible that Icom changed the meters to an internal average
> output meter, but I doubt it.
>
> Have these problems been fixed in the 756PRO3? I really like the looks of
> the PRO3 with its additional features.
>
> 73s John NE0P
>
> ________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
More information about the Icom
mailing list