[ICOM] Smoked PROII

Gerard L Krul. glkrul at telus.net
Sun Feb 5 23:49:09 EST 2006


Hi Adam.
Just read your note reagrding the PROIII,in which you found out that they 
corrected the problem.
Guess the more reason for those hams to contact Icom and see if they get 
help?
I don't have to worry about beverage antennas (city lot)
not likely it happens with my PROII.
But I made a note in the manual.
Take care.
Gerry.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adam Farson" <farson at shaw.ca>
To: "'ICOM Reflector'" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: [ICOM] Smoked PROII


> Hi Gerry,
>
> Agreed. It would be a good idea to state the maximum permissible RF input
> power at the RX-ANT jack, for example:
>
> Max. input power +20 dBm (100mW)
>
> RF instruments such as signal generators and spectrum analysers are always
> labelled in this way. The limit could be indicated in the user manual, and
> on the rear-panel ID label.
>
> Cheers for now, 73,
> Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] 
> On
> Behalf Of Gerard L Krul.
> Sent: 04 February 2006 12:30
> To: ICOM Reflector
> Subject: Re: [ICOM] Smoked PROII
>
> Adam.
> Thanks for the update,if it is a blunder or not depends.
> I guess if your transceiver bites the dust account of that input,you will
> call it a blunder.
> I do not know if there is a warning in the manual (there should be) I have
> to look if there is or not.
> Gerry ve6wg
>
>
>
> Scanned for viruses by Blue Coat
> http://www.WinProxy.com/
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> 




More information about the Icom mailing list