[ICOM] 781 vs. 756 Pro 3

[Mike Olbrisch]

Hmmmm . . . Seems to me a USED 781 even on the E-place is not as expensive
as  a NEW PRO-III.  Of course, there are always people who will pay more.

Having played with both, you can look at my QRZ photo to see that I kept.

KD9KC. 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net 
>[mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Lee Mairs (SAG)
>Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 2:35 PM
>To: ICOM Reflector
>Subject: Re: [ICOM] 781 vs. 756 Pro 3
>
>Hard to argue with this.  I, too, have a 781 as well as the 751A.  The
>781 is better, more stable, but not worth all those extra dollars.
>73 de Lee
>KM4YY/8
>
>
>flearl at msn.com wrote:
>> Hello List:
>>             I am still using the 751A, AT-500, and IC-2KL 
>combo and have no plans of changing.  Icom at it's finest...
>> 73
>> Warren NØWF
>> ----
>> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>>
>>
>>   
>----
>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/