[ICOM] TS-2000 vs. IC-910

[David S. McCallum]

AHHHHH it didn't take long for it to turn NASTY, I knew it would,,,,,Mac

On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 01:12:08 -0000 "Michael P. Olbrisch"
<mike2004 at elp.rr.com> writes:
> 
> OTOH - I would rather be off the air with a broken (but repairable) 
> ICOM
> rather than own a kenwood.
> 
> That said - if the 781 DOES ever go down, I will just pull the 706 
> out of
> the deployment box.  Not as nice as the 781, but still on the air,
> integrated to the tuner and amp, and NOT kenwood.
> 
> Mike. 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net 
> > [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of AD5VJ Bob
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 12:51 AM
> > To: 'ICOM Reflector'
> > Subject: RE: [ICOM] TS-2000 vs. IC-910
> > 
> > Now this makes sense. Cant argue this point and well spoken John.
> > 
> > I agree
> > 
> >   73 fer nw,
> > Bob AD5VJ(AAR6VM)
> > http://www.ad5vj.com/
> > 
> > Member CTDXCC
> > 10X# 37210, FP#-1141
> > SMIRK#-5177, RARS #-149
> >  
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net 
> > > [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of John Geiger
> > > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 7:39 PM
> > > To: ICOM Reflector
> > > Subject: Re: [ICOM] TS-2000 vs. IC-910
> > > 
> > > I agree about the 2 radios, but it is sure nice to have a 
> > > backup HF in case the dedicated HF goes down. 
> > > I would rather be using a TS2000 on HF for a while then QRT 
> > > on HF with a 910H.
> > > 
> > > 73s John W5TD
> 
> 
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> 
> 
 
 
David S. McCallum/USAF RET./CMSGT/W7SAC/4