[ICOM] TS-2000 vs. IC-910

[Michael P. Olbrisch]

OTOH - I would rather be off the air with a broken (but repairable) ICOM
rather than own a kenwood.

That said - if the 781 DOES ever go down, I will just pull the 706 out of
the deployment box.  Not as nice as the 781, but still on the air,
integrated to the tuner and amp, and NOT kenwood.

Mike. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net 
> [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of AD5VJ Bob
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 12:51 AM
> To: 'ICOM Reflector'
> Subject: RE: [ICOM] TS-2000 vs. IC-910
> 
> Now this makes sense. Cant argue this point and well spoken John.
> 
> I agree
> 
>   73 fer nw,
> Bob AD5VJ(AAR6VM)
> http://www.ad5vj.com/
> 
> Member CTDXCC
> 10X# 37210, FP#-1141
> SMIRK#-5177, RARS #-149
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net 
> > [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of John Geiger
> > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 7:39 PM
> > To: ICOM Reflector
> > Subject: Re: [ICOM] TS-2000 vs. IC-910
> > 
> > I agree about the 2 radios, but it is sure nice to have a 
> > backup HF in case the dedicated HF goes down. 
> > I would rather be using a TS2000 on HF for a while then QRT 
> > on HF with a 910H.
> > 
> > 73s John W5TD