[ICOM] TS-2000 vs. IC-910

W. David Paperman wpaper at ev1.net
Mon Aug 28 10:11:20 EDT 2006


I second Tony's comments.

I have had my 910H for several years and find it to be reliable and very 
flexible / easy to use.

Dave, W5WP

Tony Lord wrote:
> Mike,
> 
> 
> I own and use the ICOM IC-910, it's a great radio and has 99% of what I need
> in such a rig, I haven't tried the TS-2000 but have tried other rigs from
> that manufacturer. ICOM is great would 110% recommend.
> 
> 73's de Tony G8DQZ
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
> Behalf Of Michael Raskin
> Sent: 26 August 2006 21:08
> To: kenwood at mailman.qth.net; Icom Reflector
> Subject: [ICOM] TS-2000 vs. IC-910
> 
> I already have a good HF rig with 6M (IC-7800).  I'm looking for a VHF rig 
> for 2M CW (maybe 440, too) and, eventually, SAT.  Both have been around for 
> several years and I don't know if Icom or Kenwood plan to introduce new 
> models in the near future.  Any pros or cons?  Has anyone tried both?
> 
> Mike, W4UM (ex-K4KUZ)
> South Florida DX Association - www.qsl.net/k4fk
> Mid Florida DX Association - www.w4fdx.com
> Florida Contest Group - www.floridacontestgroup.org 
> 
> 
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> 
> 
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> 
> 
> 


More information about the Icom mailing list