[ICOM] Re Icom Issue

D C *Mac* Macdonald k2gkk at hotmail.com
Wed Aug 9 11:22:43 EDT 2006


I still have working Icom rigs that are over 30 years old.

Mac - K2GKK/5



----Original Message Follows----
From: "William Lambing" <w0lpq9 at msn.com>
Reply-To: ICOM Reflector <icom at mailman.qth.net>
To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [ICOM] Re Icom Issue
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:42:27 -0400

Well Charlie, my Drake TR4-C works great, but does not do the WARC bands, 
does not have the band scope the Pro II has, filtering is easier in the Pro 
II and numerous other items.

I sold my Pro some time ago, but put several years on it ... however, I know 
the new owner and after about 5+ years it is still going strong.

I guess it is all about what you want to do.  If you are happy with the Swan 
... fine.

But to state obsolescence in 3-5 years .. don't know about that.  How many 
Icoms are out there that are over 10 years old and still going strong??

Bill, W0LPQ


----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/




More information about the Icom mailing list