[ICOM] eHam 2720 Reviews
Gary Pearce KN4AQ
kn4aq at arrl.net
Thu Oct 6 15:53:29 EDT 2005
At 10:36 PM 10/2/2005, Mac, K2GKK/5 wrote:
>If you want .25 uV sensitivity over broad band,
>you WILL get intermod. Wideband coverage
>seems to be what MOST buyers want. ...
>Yayhoo and Kenmore are all the same.
>
>Mac, K2GKK/5
They are not all the same.
The Icom 2410 (circa 1995) was particularly good on intermod. The Kenwood
733 was pretty bad. Standard's C5900 was very immune.
Of today's radios, Yaesu's 8800/8900, based on technology from the Standard
5900, is also a good performer.
The idea that a wide-band receiver must suffer terrible intermod is a
myth. I wouldn't make a repeater receiver out of them - sure you'll do
better with a good receiver behind a tight filter. But Icom could have
done better with the 2720.
The 2720 does have some nice, unique features. If the intermod you get is
mostly from pagers, a PAR notch filter should help a lot. It goes in the
antenna line, and notches a couple of common pager channels while letting
the rest of the spectrum through.
73,
Gary KN4AQ
__________________________________________________________________________
Gary Pearce KN4AQ editor, SERA Repeater Journal
Cary, NC www.sera.org
919-380-9944 kn4aq at sera.org
kn4aq at arrl.net
AIM: KN4AQ Radio. Yahoo: KN4AQ
(send e-mail to be put on my "buddy list")
More information about the Icom
mailing list