[ICOM] Microham Keyer or RigExpert Plus?
Joe Subich, W4TV
W4TV at microham-usa.com
Fri Nov 4 13:31:44 EST 2005
Howard White writes:
> I ran a parallel test bed for a while.. RigExpert on one Computer,
> RigBlaster on a second computer both connected to the same radio...
> IC-756 Pro2, PW-1, SteppIR MonstIR... the RigExpert would decode
> digital signals about 10db better than the RigBlaster...and would
> still give 100% copy when the RigBlaster gave none...
>
> The reason was that the RigExpert had its own built in sound card
> ...which was external to the sound card inside the computers...
> hence it was not subject to the internal computer noise and
> aliasing that the internal sound card generates...
>
> USING THE INTERNAL PC SOUND CARD WOULD BE A MAJOR WEAKNESS IN THE
> MICROHAM KEYER
I wish Howard would refrain from making blanket statements on
products with which he has no first hand knowledge. In this
case he is making a freshman mistake by confusing the effect
and the cause.
Our experience (and my own measurements) indicates that while the
noise floor may be somewhat lower with an external codec (also
known as external sound card or USB sound card) the difference
is completely masked by "background" noise (sky/atmospheric noise)
on an HF channel. There is no sound card, internal or external,
that can withstand the full dynamic range (130+ dB) of a receiver
without AGC. As soon as AGC comes into play, weak signals will
be masked by nearby stronger signals (gain compression in the
receiver). If the weak signal is on a "clear" channel, simply
increasing drive to the sound card to the point that the
background noise masks the sound card noise floor results in
equivalent performance in internal and external sound cards.
The degraded performance that some experience with internal
sound cards is generally due to external factors like improper
grounding, lack of isolation ("ground loops"), improper levels.
etc. Both the computer's case (desktop) and the radio are
connected to a common power system "safety" ground through the
third wire of the power cord. The radio is generally tied
to a separate ground via the shield of the coax, many computer
sound cards and most radio designers make the mistake of tying
the audio return of unbalanced inputs and outputs to chassis
ground.
microKEYER avoids these problems by providing complete transformer
isolation of the line in/line out connections to the computer,
optically isolating the data between the USB interface and
internal microcontroller, a split power system which takes
power for the USB interface from the USB line while
powering the radio functions from the radio or external
power supply (Kenwood) and providing effective level controls
on the front panel. The device tested by Dr. White provides no
isolation or level control for received audio! His "test" is
of absolutely no value in comparing the real performance of
internal and external codecs.
Further, I know of no external sound card that provides
both simultaneous microphone level and stereo line input and
full duplex operation. Our designers have looked for codec
chips with available, standard windows compliant drivers that
provide those functions for possible use in future product
designs without success. While we could certainly "write our
own" sound drivers, that would restrict the full capability of
our products to software that was written specifically to our
specifications (e.g. MixW and RigExpert) or expose the user
to significant problems in dealing with hardware/operating
system/software conflicts.
If all one is interested in is rig control and WinLink/AFSK/etc.
the microHAM USB Interface II excels as a "Go-Kit" with a
radio like the IC-706/FT-857/etc. A USB and two audio cables
connect to the laptop and a single cable (CAT, Accessory and CW
connectors) to the radio. USB II will also do "software CW"
(DTR) or FSK (with MMTTY/EXTFSK) in a pinch. It does not impact
mic audio and provides complete isolation and level control
between the computer and radio.
73,
... Joe Subich, W4TV
microHAM America, LLC.
www.microHAM-USA.com
More information about the Icom
mailing list