[ICOM] AH-4 Icom antenna tuner
David Aukamp
d.aukamp at verizon.net
Mon Jun 6 18:49:20 EDT 2005
Not to take anything away from the 706m2g (I have 2), given a satisfactory
antenna for 12 and 17, your MP should out-perform the 706m2g. The MP has a
built in tuner; the 706m2g does not. The 706m2g would need a tuner
(coupler) to level the playing field. You might be happier with the AT-180
over the AH-4 if mobiling is not an issue.
However, you would be best advised to invest in the antenna side of the
equation. Your TH7dx does not cover 17 or 12. Your 80 Meter dipole will not
tune them well and it lacks directivity. I recently swapped my trusty
TH3Mk3 for a 5-band yagi for for just that reason. Alternatively you might
consider replacing the dipole with a G5RV that can be tuned to all bands 80
thru 10.
I hope these thoughts are helpful.
Dave - K4QT
At 03:06 PM 6/6/2005 -0400, you wrote:
>Message: 1
>Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:16:59 EDT
>From: W4ABW at aol.com
>Subject: [ICOM] AH-4 Icom antenna tuner
>To: icom at mailman.qth.net
>Message-ID: <e6.6b3efd8d.2fd5d0fb at aol.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
>I am thinking about the AH-4 for my 706 MKIIG.
>
>I will run at 100w.
>
>I have an 80m dipole and a TH7DX.
>
>With the AH-4 tuner and the 706, should I expect that I can work DX on 17
>and 12 better than I can work DX now using the FT 1000MP and TH7DX on
>17 and 12
>which is poor, poor, poor.
>
>thanks
>Al
>W4ABW
David W. Aukamp
Lab-Volt Systems Inc.
Phone 800-560-1749
Fax 727-733-7175
More information about the Icom
mailing list