[ICOM] IC-736 reception

Juan Pablo Mercé LU4DX lu4dx at hotmail.com
Thu Dec 15 09:06:44 EST 2005


Yes, I believe that a DSP is the best option, I use a MFJ-784B a time ago
with my IC-736 and really improvement the reception, very useful de NR and
Auto Notch.
I don't plan to sell my IC-736 but buying an IC781 or IC775DSP in the future
(I like very much these rig) to mount a SO2R station.
How much a 781/775 in US ?, here in Argentina they are very expensive and
there is few for sale.
Thank again Adam and Tom.

CU & 73's Paul LU4DX

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael P. Olbrisch" <mike2004 at elp.rr.com>
To: "'ICOM Reflector'" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 9:22 AM
Subject: RE: [ICOM] IC-736 reception


>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> > [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Adam Farson
> > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 7:33 AM
> > To: 'ICOM Reflector'
> > Subject: RE: [ICOM] IC-736 reception
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > The cost of all those filters may well end up exceeding the
> > value of the
> > radio - to say nothing of all the installation work required.
> > One advantage
> > of the DSP unit is that it will also provide noise reduction.
>
> AND you can save it for the next radio.
>
> I have a Timewave DSP-599zx.  I use it on my IC-781.  I also use it on my
> satellite radio.  It works well for both purposes.
>
> Mike.  KD9KC
> El Paso, TX.
>
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>


More information about the Icom mailing list