[ICOM] 756 Tested

[GGLL]

	From the several mails posted regarding the subject, I guess one would expect
better results having a preamplifier on-off switch facility, than only have
the attenuator (and/or Kenwood's "AIP" switch) with the preamplifier always
on, am I correct?.

Best regards
Guillermo - LU8EYW.

Hans Remeeus escribió:
> Impressive.
> 
> For example: http://www.w8ji.com/receiver%20IM3%20sorted.htm
> where W8JI writes: "3.) You use too much gain in the receiver front end."
> 
> Many operators use their pre-amplifier(s) too often.
> 
> I only use them on 14 MHz and higher; if really necessary.
> 
> On 1.8, 3.6 and 7 MHz I only use Attenuation... In crowded Europe this
> is 'a must'.
> 
> 
> 73,
> Hans Remeeus (PA1HR)
> http://www.remeeus.nl
> Communication is about people, the rest is technology.
> 
> 
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: <flearl at msn.com>
> To: <icom at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 5:27 PM
> Subject: [ICOM] 756 Tested
> 
>> Hello:
>>      Suggest anyone contemplating an Icom 756 look at
>> http://www.w8ji.com click on receivers and the tests are at the
>> bottom. Make your own conclusions.
>> 73
>> Warren N0WF
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>