[ICOM] 756 Tested
John Geiger
ne0p at lcisp.com
Sat Aug 20 13:16:35 EDT 2005
Based on actual on-the-air use, the receiver is not as bad as the figures
indicate. It is certain better than the receiver on the 706MKIIG ( you
would have to look hard to find a receiver worse than a MKIIG) although his
figures put the MKIIG ahead. The 756 is probably not as good as the 775,
but it certain is a very good HF performer.
73s John NE0P
----- Original Message -----
From: <flearl at msn.com>
To: <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 3:27 PM
Subject: [ICOM] 756 Tested
> Hello:
> Suggest anyone contemplating an Icom 756 look at http://www.w8ji.com
> click on receivers and the tests are at the bottom. Make your own
> conclusions.
> 73
> Warren N0WF
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
More information about the Icom
mailing list