[ICOM] 756 Tested

John Geiger ne0p at lcisp.com
Sat Aug 20 13:16:35 EDT 2005


Based on actual on-the-air use, the receiver is not as bad as the figures
indicate.  It is certain better than the receiver on the 706MKIIG ( you
would have to look hard to find a receiver worse than a MKIIG) although his
figures put the MKIIG ahead.  The 756 is probably not as good as the 775,
but it certain is a very good HF performer.

73s John NE0P

----- Original Message -----
From: <flearl at msn.com>
To: <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 3:27 PM
Subject: [ICOM] 756 Tested


> Hello:
>       Suggest anyone contemplating an Icom 756 look at http://www.w8ji.com
> click on receivers and the tests are at the bottom. Make your own
> conclusions.
> 73
> Warren N0WF
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>



More information about the Icom mailing list