[ICOM] Amazing Comparison
Jerry K3BZ
k3bz at arrl.net
Thu Aug 18 11:29:28 EDT 2005
Bob... I haven't done it but since you are obviously interested have you
compared the measured specs in the ARRL test lab's reviews of the 3 radios?
It would be interesting to see if the difference in selectivity is noted
there.
73, Jerry K3BZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "KE5CTY Bob" <rtnmi at sbcglobal.net>
To: "Icom Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:22 PM
Subject: [ICOM] Amazing Comparison
> I did a little research today and downloaded the manuals
> for the whole 756 line including the Pros.
>
> After looking at the specs closely the Interesting thing
> was the selectivity is less on the new ones II and III
> than on the IcomPro by almost a full kilohertz.
>
> Any other differences that offset that change?
>
> 73 fer nw,
> Bob
> KE5CTY (old calls WB5ZQU - WY5L)
> 10X# 37210, FP#-1141, SMIRK#-5177
> http://www.qsl.net/ke5cty/
> Code may be taking a back seat for now,
> but the pioneering spirit that put the code
> there in the first place is out front of it all.
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
More information about the Icom
mailing list