[ICOM] 756 vs 756Pro2
JohnD
wm7a at cox.net
Thu Sep 9 15:32:04 EDT 2004
Mike,
Yeah, I have heard that the CW tone with the wider 250Hz BW just masks the
clicks and when the BW is narrowed that the clicks then become apparent.
John DeRuiter, WM7A
http://members.cox.net/wm7a/
-----Original Message-----
From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Mike Clarson
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 11:50 AM
To: 'ICOM Reflector'
Subject: RE: [ICOM] 756 vs 756Pro2
John: Clicks outside 50KHz? I would bet they were really there, coming from
the transmitter and NOT a problem with the rcvr or filtering. It actually
demonstrates how sharp the filter really is.--Mike, WV2ZOW
-----Original Message-----
From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of JohnD
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 1:52 PM
To: ICOM Reflector
Subject: [ICOM] 756 vs 756Pro2
Gentlemen,
...... The pro2's adjustable filter width and shape is really nice, 250Hz
sounds
good, but 50Hz has clicks well outside filter BW.........
Any comments are appreciated.
John DeRuiter, WM7A
http://members.cox.net/wm7a/
-
----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
More information about the Icom
mailing list