[ICOM] ICOM 730

Ed Yeary w4tey at bellsouth.net
Mon Oct 11 04:30:41 EDT 2004


Let's see. 720, 730, 740, then 735? As we would say here in TN. Ain't that
kinda bassakards? Using the same logic the next radio should have been the
725.

Ed Yeary W4TEY
GO VOLS!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jay Bareman" <Radio_Q at mchsi.com>
To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ICOM] ICOM 730


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William Diamond" <wjdiamond at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 10:07 PM
> Subject: RE: [ICOM] ICOM 730
>
>
> I believe the next Icom rig after the 730 was the IC 740.  The 735 came
much
> later...........
>
>
> I think Bill is right.  The QST did the review on the 740 in September
1983
> and the review on the 735 in January 1986.  Both units had serial numbers
> in the 1100-1300 range.
>
> Jay
>
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/




More information about the Icom mailing list