[ICOM] NB in Icom 751A
Bill NY9H
ny9h at arrl.net
Mon May 31 18:07:23 EDT 2004
i agree it is better than in the proII...
I even wrote Mr. Inoue a letter about his next ( 7800) radio , and that the
NB needed to be better....than the previous attempts. I believe that it
needed to be not just some lame DSP approach...
I understand from the manuals that the 7800 appears to do it right.. with
adj blank time and threshold depth before the DSP... now the big
question,,,, how well does it work ????? with power line noise as well as
"ignition" pulses..
( for all those 7800 mobile applications)
bill
At 04:43 PM 5/31/2004, you wrote:
>John Geiger wrote:
>
>>OK, now that I know that the 751A is definitely worth
>>it over the plain 751, and have found a good deal (I
>>think) for 1-$425 shipped with Trimmer caps replaced
>>and new RAM battery, I have another question. Is the
>>NB any good in the 751A? The current Icom NB seem
>>pretty worthless. I live in an area with power line
>>noise that I am trying to get fixed, but would like a
>>quiet receiver with an effective NB. Does the 751A
>>meet these criteria?
>>73s John NE0P
>>
>>
>>
>>__________________________________
>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
>>http://messenger.yahoo.com/ ----
>>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>I find it to be much better than a proII.
>
>John N1JM
>----
>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
More information about the Icom
mailing list