[ICOM] IC-7800

awallacejr at sbcglobal.net awallacejr at sbcglobal.net
Mon May 24 15:23:28 EDT 2004


Which version of the monthly Orion bug fixes did Tom test?

Andy K5VM


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Tippett" <btippett at alum.mit.edu>
To: <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:59 PM
Subject: [ICOM] IC-7800


> I wrote:
> 
>  >Possible conclusions:
> 
> 1.  Icom's claims may be more hype than substance, and there
> could be some specsmanship games being played.
> 2.  ARRL's measurements were bad.
> 3.  The unit under test was bad.
> 
>          Someone directed me to W8JI's Receiver Tests website which
> has been updated to include both the 7800 and Orion.  In addition
> to IMD measurements, Tom has added MDS and BDR for the 7800 which
> I have never seen published anywhere previously:
> 
> http://www.w8ji.com/receiver_tests.htm
> 
> Tom's 2 kHz spaced IMD measurements of the 7800 and Orion agree
> exactly (78 dB for 7800 and 92 dB for Orion) with Sherwood's, which
> gives me some confidence that we can eliminate conclusions #2 and #3
> above.  It will be very interesting to see ARRL's final report late
> this summer.  Hopefully RSGB's RadCom report will be out soon also.
> 
>                                          73,  Bill  W4ZV
> 
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> 



More information about the Icom mailing list