[ICOM] IC-7800
awallacejr at sbcglobal.net
awallacejr at sbcglobal.net
Mon May 24 15:23:28 EDT 2004
Which version of the monthly Orion bug fixes did Tom test?
Andy K5VM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Tippett" <btippett at alum.mit.edu>
To: <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:59 PM
Subject: [ICOM] IC-7800
> I wrote:
>
> >Possible conclusions:
>
> 1. Icom's claims may be more hype than substance, and there
> could be some specsmanship games being played.
> 2. ARRL's measurements were bad.
> 3. The unit under test was bad.
>
> Someone directed me to W8JI's Receiver Tests website which
> has been updated to include both the 7800 and Orion. In addition
> to IMD measurements, Tom has added MDS and BDR for the 7800 which
> I have never seen published anywhere previously:
>
> http://www.w8ji.com/receiver_tests.htm
>
> Tom's 2 kHz spaced IMD measurements of the 7800 and Orion agree
> exactly (78 dB for 7800 and 92 dB for Orion) with Sherwood's, which
> gives me some confidence that we can eliminate conclusions #2 and #3
> above. It will be very interesting to see ARRL's final report late
> this summer. Hopefully RSGB's RadCom report will be out soon also.
>
> 73, Bill W4ZV
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
More information about the Icom
mailing list