[ICOM] Icom 756 PRO III

[Brian Hemmis]

I said the same thing abt the Pro 2 over the original Pro...
Maybe staying 1 model behind the latest is the way to go...


On Jul 31, 2004, at 10:55 AM, Jerry Keller wrote:

> If that's all the ProIII offers over the ProII, seems like a big waste 
> of time. 73, Jerry K3BZ
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Robb Romans
>   To: ICOM Reflector
>   Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 11:46 PM
>   Subject: Re: [ICOM] Icom 756 PRO III
>
>
>   -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>   Hash: SHA1
>
>   On Thursday 29 July 2004 11:36 am, Icom 765 wrote:
>> Not sure if this is a valid site.  If so, looks like the Pro III is
>> coming!
>>
>> http://www.cqcqde.com/topix/topix.htm
>>
>> 73, Mike
>
>   Here's one in English:
>   <http://www.qsl.net/ab4oj/icom/ic756pro3/756p3.html>
>
>
>   73, Robb
>
>   - --
>   Robb Romans
>   Linux Commando
>   http://www.killsoft.com
>
>   -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>   Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
>   iD8DBQFBCxYvaTpPaRRJCYcRAptBAJ9SLfY2JP8TQWKv60AVwJxo2x4W2QCfcIdf
>   38aYatuEUCWOWPTUQegoO4Q=
>   =eXkQ
>   -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>   ----
>   Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>   Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>   Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>