[ICOM] Useless chatter

[Adam Farson]

I had no objection to the message. There is nothing wrong with a bit of wry
humour.

Lighten up, guys!

Best 73,
Adam, VA7OJ/AB4OJ
Moderator, Yahoo! ic756pro2 Group
 

-----Original Message-----
From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
Behalf Of Jim Isbell
Sent: 20 July 2004 07:14
To: ICOM Reflector
Subject: Re: [ICOM] Useless chatter

If you do that, then maybe I should also.  I hope this is not the case.

Tom Norris wrote:

> Is it? If so, and if this list is for technical discussion *only* and 
> not general comments, I'll just unsubscribe and save folks from such 
> useless chatter.
>
> Tom
>
>> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 07:36:01 -0500
>> From: Skip Cameron <scameron at austin.rr.com>
>> To: Tom Norris <r390a at bellsouth.net>
>> Subject: Useless chatter
>>
>>
>> Tom:
>> This message and others like it are unworthy of this reflector.
>> It clutters up this email reflector and serves no purpose.
>> Skip W5GAI
>> -----------
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:36:54 -0500
>> From: Tom Norris <r390a at bellsouth.net>
>> Subject: Re: [ICOM] For Sale: IC-756PRO II
>>
>>
>> This is about the 4th 756ProII I've seen for sale in the past couple 
>> weeks on several lists. Must be a conspiracy or something.
>> hehe
>> Tom NU4G
>
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net Icom 
> Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz Icom FAQ: 
> http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>


----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net Icom Users
Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/