[ICOM] New Pro III - Hold On Guys!
John L Merrill
jmerrill1 at adelphia.net
Sun Aug 22 07:20:16 EDT 2004
K2SNJ wrote:
> I am considering a TenTec Jupiter. Has anyone compared one to a 746pro or
> 756pro for receiver selectivity and sensitivity?
>
> Jim
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Icom 765" <icom765 at hotmail.com>
> To: <icom at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 9:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [ICOM] New Pro III - Hold On Guys!
>
>
>
>>I have to agree with your logic Dave. Mine is a little different. I
>
> cannot
>
>>see any reason to upgrade from my IC 765. Not to throw gas on the fire,
>>but, pick a contest day ... anyone here in the US. Put a 765 on the table
>>with say any of the newer Icoms (I don't want to pick on any particular
>>one). Add a TenTec Jupiter ... then decide which one you think is better.
>>Could be a VERY hard choice depending what your operating style is and
>
> what
>
>>you like.
>>
>>73, Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>>From: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e at comcast.net>
>>>Reply-To: ICOM Reflector <icom at mailman.qth.net>
>>>To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
>>>Subject: Re: [ICOM] New Pro III - Hold On Guys!
>>>Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:05:01 -0400
>>>
>>>But I am not sure how I lose a ton of money, and how Icom will make more
>>>money.
>>>My Pro works great, and I see no reason to trade up.
>>>If there was a circuit which caused my Pro to self-destruct when the Pro
>
> 2
>
>>>came out, well...that would then be a money making scheme (to say the
>>>least!!)
>>>...Dave
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
>>http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>>
>>----
>>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>>
>
>
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
Jim:
The 756/756 pro has much better sensitivty and much better
strong/adjacent signal handling capability. Depending on your operating
style and preferences the ICOMs are a much better bang for the buck.
IMHO they blow away the Jupiter. You might get the pitch from Ten Tec
users about service but I've never had problems with ICOM service.
John N1JM
More information about the Icom
mailing list