[ICOM] criticism of other manufacturer's radios

William Diamond wjdiamond at sbcglobal.net
Sun Aug 22 01:15:28 EDT 2004


Hi Dick,

How right you are.  I will list my opinions of other radios on my Web Site
in the future, after all, that is what it is for, my uncensored opinions.  I
just added room for another 11 pages recently.

73

           WILLIAM J. DIAMOND
          ROGERS, ARKANSAS USA

        HAM RADIO OPERATOR WROT
 VISIT MY NEW RADIO ROOM REVISED 7-04, AT
           www.wjdiamond.com

       DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY SITE IS AT
http://pages.sbcglobal.net/wjdiamond/index.html


-----Original Message-----
From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Dick Flanagan
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 11:59 PM
To: ICOM Reflector
Subject: Re: [ICOM] criticism of other manufacturer's radios


Comparison of other radios to Icom is healthy, even when one or the other
or both might be critical, but I agree that this is not the place for
one-sided flaming of other manufacturer's radio.  Take it outside, Guys.

At 09:56 PM 8/21/2004, Clark Savage Turner wrote:
 >My personal opinion.  Happy to correspond more about it (probably off
 >line is best.)

Heh!  You got that right.  :)

73, Dick
--
Dick Flanagan K7VC NV SM
E-mail: k7vc at arrl.org


----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/




More information about the Icom mailing list