[ICOM] criticism of other manufacturer's radios
William Diamond
wjdiamond at sbcglobal.net
Sun Aug 22 01:15:28 EDT 2004
Hi Dick,
How right you are. I will list my opinions of other radios on my Web Site
in the future, after all, that is what it is for, my uncensored opinions. I
just added room for another 11 pages recently.
73
WILLIAM J. DIAMOND
ROGERS, ARKANSAS USA
HAM RADIO OPERATOR WROT
VISIT MY NEW RADIO ROOM REVISED 7-04, AT
www.wjdiamond.com
DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY SITE IS AT
http://pages.sbcglobal.net/wjdiamond/index.html
-----Original Message-----
From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Dick Flanagan
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 11:59 PM
To: ICOM Reflector
Subject: Re: [ICOM] criticism of other manufacturer's radios
Comparison of other radios to Icom is healthy, even when one or the other
or both might be critical, but I agree that this is not the place for
one-sided flaming of other manufacturer's radio. Take it outside, Guys.
At 09:56 PM 8/21/2004, Clark Savage Turner wrote:
>My personal opinion. Happy to correspond more about it (probably off
>line is best.)
Heh! You got that right. :)
73, Dick
--
Dick Flanagan K7VC NV SM
E-mail: k7vc at arrl.org
----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
More information about the Icom
mailing list