[ICOM] FL-53 vs FL-53A ?

[Adam Farson]

Hi guys,

The FL-53 is 6 mm taller than the FL-53A. They are electrically identical.
The same applies to the FL-52 and FL-44.

Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
 

-----Original Message-----
From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
Behalf Of ak0a
Sent: 18 August 2004 19:28
To: ICOM Reflector
Subject: Re: [ICOM] FL-53 vs FL-53A ?

i have a 718 and use the fl53
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Melland, W9WIS" <w9wis at charter.net>
To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: [ICOM] FL-53 vs FL-53A ?


> Unless someone can tell me otherwise that it's not the case.... I have
been
> informed that the FL-53 and FL-53A are electrically identical.  Apparently
> the FL-53 is taller then the newer FL-53A and but for that fact is
> interchangable with the "A" model where it will fit in height.  Apparently
> some rigs can't use the non-A as it's taller height is an issue.  The
email
> I received was from another user of a 718 who reports happily using the
> older FL-53.
>
> Mike
>
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>

----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/


Scanned by WinProxy
http://www.Ositis.com/