[ICOM] PW1

[Richard Hicks]

Thanks Steve,

I am looking for a used one and want to make sure I do not get the 
older version.

73
Dick

-----Original Message-----
From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 20:36
To: ICOM Reflector
Subject: Re: [ICOM] PW1


February, 2001, QST says "In early IC-PW1's (before serial number 1165), 
you could not bypass the amplifier and use your transceiver barefoot 
without turning on the amplifier and using the AMP/PROTECT switch to put 
the amplifier in standby. ICOM changed the circuit in current production 
'PW1's . . . . "

Steve
K8JQ

Richard Hicks wrote:
> Can someone tell me at what serial # Icom began making the version where
> the amp is not required to be on to use the exciter.
> 
> Thanks Dick
> _________________________________________
> Richard Hicks
> K4UTE at arrl.net
> http://www.nfdxa.com/k4ute/k4ute.html
> _________________________________________
> 
> 
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> 

----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/