[Icom] Duplicate reflections

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 23:09:47 -0700

Ed,

I don't think the situation has anything to do with replying. Most of the=20
time I'm sitting in the background "reading the mail" (that phrase finally=
=20
means what it says), not replying and I get the doubles. I'me keeping close=
=20
tabs on when it happens & so far the only doubles in the last 2 days=20
involve Adam Farson - maybe that's because what he has to say is so=
 important.

73 - Larry W=D8NFU
[email protected]

At 12:54 AM 4/27/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>Uhhhh I haven't been getting dupes but when I used the reply to all feature
>I get double [email protected] addresses in the "To " bar.  Could that=
 be
>it?
>ED AND CARRIE YEARY
>325 CUMBERLAND DRIVE
>HARROGATE, TN. 37752-6942
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Adam Farson" <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 7:56 PM
>Subject: RE: [Icom] Duplicate reflections
>
>
> > Hi Larry,
> >
> > Strange - I have not seen any dupes at my end. Mind you, I did=
 cross-post
>a
> > couple of messages to this one and the IC-756Pro2 reflector (Yahoo).
> >
> > Cheers for now, 73,
> > Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> > Behalf Of Larry
> > Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 12:06
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Icom] Duplicate relections
> >
> >
> > A pattern(?) has started to become known. Twice, since I brought up this
> > problem yesterday, I've received duplicates from Adam Farson. I'm not
> > pointing any fingers just observing.
> >
> > This is getting more and more curious.
> >
> > 73 - Larry W=D8NFU
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> > At 11:42 AM 4/26/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >
> > >I've got a sneaky feeling that this intermittent problem lies with my
>ISP.
> > >I have cable modem and AT&T just sold out to ComCast & maybe something
> > >glitched on the way. As soon as wife gets off phone, I'll call them.=
 How
> > >much does anybody want to bet that they'll point and say "it must be
> > >somewhere else because there's no way we could cause that to happen."
> > >Thirty seven years in the computer business taught me that many outfits
> > >operate on the premise that "We can't do anything wrong."
> > >
> > >To the phones.
> > >73 - Larry W=D8NFU
> > >[email protected]
> > >
> > >At 12:06 PM 4/26/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> > >
> > >>de WB2CPN South Central Pennsylvania   2003.04.26
> > >>
> > >>Perhaps the duplicates, called SUSDUP's where I once worked,
> > >>are caused by the network architecture.  Some reflectors
> > >>and alias machines are placed in redundant pairs or greater.
> > >>These pairs update each other almost, but not quiet, real time.
> > >>This arrangement provides a capability for disaster recovery,
> > >>and makes access faster in some configurations.  Now, it
> > >>could be that the members of a pair are getting their protocol
> > >>mixed up, and you're getting replies from both, not just
> > >>from one.   For what it's worth.  (You might want to look
> > >>at the entire header of the duplicated messages and see if
> > >>there is a clue there.)        73  Clete
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>----
> > >>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
> > >>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.315 MHz
> > >>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> > >
> > >----
> > >Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
> > >Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.315 MHz
> > >Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> >
> > ----
> > Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
> > Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.315 MHz
> > Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> >
> > ----
> > Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
> > Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.315 MHz
> > Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> >
>
>
>----
>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.315 MHz
>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/