[Icom] Duplicate relections

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 12:06:15 -0700

A pattern(?) has started to become known. Twice, since I brought up this=20
problem yesterday, I've received duplicates from Adam Farson. I'm not=20
pointing any fingers just observing.

This is getting more and more curious.

73 - Larry W=D8NFU
[email protected]

At 11:42 AM 4/26/2003 -0700, you wrote:

>I've got a sneaky feeling that this intermittent problem lies with my ISP.=
=20
>I have cable modem and AT&T just sold out to ComCast & maybe something=20
>glitched on the way. As soon as wife gets off phone, I'll call them. How=20
>much does anybody want to bet that they'll point and say "it must be=20
>somewhere else because there's no way we could cause that to happen."=20
>Thirty seven years in the computer business taught me that many outfits=20
>operate on the premise that "We can't do anything wrong."
>
>To the phones.
>73 - Larry W=D8NFU
>[email protected]
>
>At 12:06 PM 4/26/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>de WB2CPN South Central Pennsylvania   2003.04.26
>>
>>Perhaps the duplicates, called SUSDUP's where I once worked,
>>are caused by the network architecture.  Some reflectors
>>and alias machines are placed in redundant pairs or greater.
>>These pairs update each other almost, but not quiet, real time.
>>This arrangement provides a capability for disaster recovery,
>>and makes access faster in some configurations.  Now, it
>>could be that the members of a pair are getting their protocol
>>mixed up, and you're getting replies from both, not just
>>from one.   For what it's worth.  (You might want to look
>>at the entire header of the duplicated messages and see if
>>there is a clue there.)        73  Clete
>>
>>
>>----
>>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
>>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.315 MHz
>>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
>----
>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.315 MHz
>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/