[Icom] Re: IC-751A vs. IC-765

[Rich Dailey, KA8OKH]

At 02:22 AM 10/31/2002, you wrote:

>I am thinking of upgrading from a 751A to a 765. The 751A is certainly a nice rig, but my only rig for comparison was a Swan 700. I'd like to hear some opinions and wisdom from the members of this list as to whether it's worth the time and money to upgrade. My interests are DX and a little bit of casual contesting. I am particularly interested in a comparison of receiver performance. Will I really be able to tell the difference between the two rigs? The 751A does not have an internal PS or tuner, but that's not a big problem for me. It would be great if someone who has owned both rigs can comment. Thanks.

Hi Chuck.  I've owned a 751, 751a, 761, and (currently) a 765.  IMO, 

751 - good
751A - *Much* better
761 - Basically a 751A in new clothes (again, my opinion - someone might chime in on this)
765 - *Much better* than 761

In crowded (ie, contest) conditions, the 765 excels, especially with the 250hz
filters.  Very reliable,  large front panel with wide control spacing.  A few - what
I would call essential - mods include the passband tuning mod - there is also a mod
for agc, and a front end PIN diode mod.  I would also highly recommend the tracking sidetone
circuit,  from the aug '93 (i think) QST,  especially if you contest a lot.  Built in tuner,
but I rarely use it.  Built in power supply is nice,  but makes for a heavy package.  I have
also run into a few minor heat related issues - see my web page.

I also have a 746 (un-pro),  but find myself gravitating back to the 765 in contests.

In short,  I think the 765 is probably the best value in the used Icom market,  probably
the best used hf transceiver value all 'round.

I think you'd be satisfied with an upgrade to a good 765.  Also be sure to check Adam's
pages for links to the mods.

Rich, KA8OKH