[Icom] Icom IC Pro II

Wed, 29 May 2002 10:11:44 -0700

Thank you everyone, I am now the proud owner of an Icom 756 Pro II and I feel
really good about my decision.  Everyone's information was very valuable and
informative.

Best 73,

Eric   N4HGZ

Steve Jones wrote:

> Matt good post...finally someone who makes a great point based on Fact!!!
> 73, Steve
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matt Erickson" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 9:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [Icom] Icom IC Pro II
>
> > DSP can do FAR more than ANY old "analog" radio can, even at it's best.
> So,
> > using the number of conversion levels to judge a radio's  design
> > superiority is invalid in this case.
> > Read my review/comparison of the PRO, PRO II on my web site;
> www.qsl.net/kk5dr/
> >
> > 73 de Matt KK5DR
> >
> > At 09:20 PM 5/7/02 -0700, you wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >Can anyone reccommend the Pro II, I am also going to Dayton and will be
> > >talking to Icom and might get one myself.  One thing that surprised me
> > >was that it only has a tripple conversion reciever, My origional 756 has
> > >a Quadruple conversion reciever.  I have seen the rig up in CT. while on
> > >a trip to the ARRL and I was really impressed but I am not sure if I
> > >should get it now or wait till the price comes down a little.
> > >
> > >THanks,
> > >
> > >Eric   N4HGZ
> > >
> > >
> > >----
> > >Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
> > >Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> >
> > ----
> > Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
> > Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> >
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/