[Icom] Icom IC Pro II

Wed, 8 May 2002 19:15:52 -0400

Matt good post...finally someone who makes a great point based on Fact!!!
73, Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Erickson" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Icom] Icom IC Pro II

> DSP can do FAR more than ANY old "analog" radio can, even at it's best.
So,
> using the number of conversion levels to judge a radio's  design
> superiority is invalid in this case.
> Read my review/comparison of the PRO, PRO II on my web site;
www.qsl.net/kk5dr/
>
> 73 de Matt KK5DR
>
> At 09:20 PM 5/7/02 -0700, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Can anyone reccommend the Pro II, I am also going to Dayton and will be
> >talking to Icom and might get one myself.  One thing that surprised me
> >was that it only has a tripple conversion reciever, My origional 756 has
> >a Quadruple conversion reciever.  I have seen the rig up in CT. while on
> >a trip to the ARRL and I was really impressed but I am not sure if I
> >should get it now or wait till the price comes down a little.
> >
> >THanks,
> >
> >Eric   N4HGZ
> >
> >
> >----
> >Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
> >Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>