[Icom] IC756PROll vs ORION

[icom@mailman.qth.net]

You might have more more fun on the Ten Tec site than here dissing Icom with
the prospect of a Ten Tec prototype turning out to be worthwhile. If you
think my response was anger, you must be about 12 or a troll. No, I take
that back--using CW abbreviations in e-mails would put you more like 80. "hi
hi" And I guess it is not yet type certified by the FCC, right?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Jones" <nx1g@rev.net>
To: <icom@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Icom] IC756PROll vs ORION


> Andy you might want to search out some anger control man. This is just a
> hobby and a service...I merely stated the facts. If you don't like those
> facts or my post. Hit the delete button. That is what I will do with your
> posts from now on. Your way too serious for me and ham radio...Back to the
> fun of ham radios...hi hi
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <awallacejr@charter.net>
> To: <icom@mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 3:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [Icom] IC756PROll vs ORION
>
>
> > Where can you buy the Orion right now? Or did you see some handmade
> > prototype? If you did, I still call it vaporware. Does it have an FCC
type
> > approval? So that I can see the specs on the FCC web site?
> >
> > Andy  K5VM