[Icom] Does the new Icom Pro require

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 22:42:08 -0800

Yep...it's that phase of the moon again. Better get out onto the patio and
howl.

Tail-wags,

MacGyver

(See me on http://www.qsl.net/ab4oj/macgyver/macgyver.html)

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
Behalf Of w3jo
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 14:49
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Icom] Does the new Icom Pro require

Why gamble on such a potential problem. Does anyone think that maybe just a
simple phone call to Icom would bring an answer before trying to place it in
a circuit, instead of trying to solve it here? Good luck

                                               Joe...W3JO

> Might be just a rumor then - if it was real, ICOM should have corrected it
> or acknowledged it by now. Anybody know the source of this?
>
> There is no mention of a keying current typo in the Feb 2002 QST writeup
of
> the PRO-II or the extended test report (I just looked).
e specs of the relay at
> the OEM site?
>
> Jerry W4UK
>
> At 11:20 AM 2/17/2002 -0600, George, W5YR wrote:
> >I don't know,  Jerry, since Icom to my knowledge has never admitted to
the
> >typo in either manual. In fact, a most interesting question would be what
> >would Icom do about a relay on a radio in warranty that was welded due to
> >trying to pass up to 2 amps through it?