[Icom] IC 756 Pro II ADAM

Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:59:11 -0700

Hi,
I'll be more blunt, this guy is either nut case or had one too many 
holiday spirits.
Even if what he says is true(which is very doubtful), that is not the 
way to babble.
73,
Happy new Year
Tony, VE6CGX

[email protected] wrote:

>Mr Roberto--
>
>Adam is far too polite to respond to your misguided post. I assume it is as
>a result of a web translator language difficulty. Adam, imho, has forgotten
>more about amateur radios and antennas--and their technical specs--than most
>of us--including you--will ever learn. Of course you are entitled to your
>opinion. Why don't you take it to the Yaesu group and see if they agree with
>you on the *quality* of the Mark V? Sounds like you have a pretty good
>antenna--at least a big one! :-)
>
>Andy K5VM
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 3:21 PM
>Subject: Re: [Icom] IC 756 Pro II ADAM
>
>
>  
>
>>Mr Adam
>>after looking for some time on your e-mail on the mark v and the proll
>>i think you need to know some fact:
>>do you have the mark v  i know you don't have it
>>proll you have yes i have this 2 rig
>>and what antenna do you have?
>>you have poor GP antenna.
>>now i use 22 element logperiodic antenna
>>and did test one on one the 2 radio the
>>mark v is the best receiver ever made
>>the 1000d came 3rd
>>the 2nd proll
>>yes indeed.
>>i don't like people like you that have some opinion with no fact
>>if you don't have the radio don't send some people to see what the
>>    
>>
>reflector
>  
>
>>say about it. most of the problem that some have is using a very poor g5rv
>>    
>>
>or
>  
>
>>GP antenna like u use. i think it is better first to have a good antenna
>>    
>>
>then
>  
>
>>have a good radio. now what some doing is buy a nice high end car and go
>>    
>>
>off
>  
>
>>road
>>is the car will be OK after long drive on off road >? well i don't think
>>    
>>
>so.
>  
>
>>that's how i look at it
>>i have many top end radio receiver as well, and i have to say that for me
>>    
>>
>the
>  
>
>>mark v is best receiver. the proll i love this radio i have 2 of this
>>    
>>
>radio.
>  
>
>>it is a good radio.
>>so lets keep it nice
>>if you don't have the radio do not send us to look on some other web
>>    
>>
>pages.
>  
>
>>and first have a good antenna. or have a poor antenna and old radio they
>>    
>>
>will
>  
>
>>work just fine as well
>>Roberto T
>>
>>ITALY
>>
>>
>>OK WE SEE YOUR WEB PAGE  STOP SHOW OF IT IS NOT NICE
>>
>>
>>--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>>multipart/alternative
>>  text/plain (text body -- kept)
>>  text/html
>>The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
>>or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
>>Please post in Plain-Text only.---
>>----
>>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
>>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.315 MHz
>>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>>    
>>
>
>----
>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan W6OLD, [email protected]
>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.315 MHz
>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
>  
>

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
Please post in Plain-Text only.---