[HomeBrew] RE: Options For FM RX & TX Crystal Replacement?
Robert McConnell
[email protected]
Sun, 17 Feb 2002 23:50:17 -0500
At 2/18/02 10:41 AM +0900, LIM,CHIN-LEONG (A-Malaysia,ex2) wrote:
>The plain vanilla synthesizer is stable enough for most application below 70
>cm. Above 70 cm, you may need to temperature compensate the synthesizer's
>reference crystal, eg. OCXO or TCXO. Additionally, the stability requirement
>is different depending on the modulation - SSB being more demanding than FM.
>
>DCkit (in US) and Minikits (in Australia) have synthesizer kits that may
>work with your application. Both companies advertise their products on the
>web. Their web addresses are listed below:-
The military receiver R-1051 is a synthesized unit. It covers 2-30MHz, and
was specced to have less than 1 Hz drift per day. However, the oscillator
circuits are in an oven, kept at a stable temperature. The adjustment
required the tech to make a change, then wait ten minutes before testing it
to allow the oven to return to the correct temperature after the
screwdriver was removed. Unfortunately, that module had to be replaced
after about 10,000 rounds from our 5" guns. During our last six month trip
to the Gulf of Tonkin ('72-'73), we had to replace all 9 of them at least once.
Wasn't there an article in Ham Magazine in '73 or '74 describing how to
build a crystal oscillator with temperature correction using some caps with
negative temperature coefficients? If your base frequency standard is
accurate enough, the synthesizer would be quite stable.
Bob McConnell
N2SPP