[Heathkit] Suggestion for legal limit AM amp (was Heath Warrior as an AM amplifier)
Bry Carling
bcarling at cfl.rr.com
Tue Jan 17 16:15:11 EST 2012
Good observations. Most of the good older AM/CW receivers I have owned had an AVC
control on them though, including my very first one - an R1155A receiver.
I love the sound of a DX60.
On 17 Jan 2012 at 13:12, Richard Knoppow wrote:
From: "Richard Knoppow" <1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Nickels" <ranickel at comcast.net>
> To: <heathkit at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 9:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [Heathkit] Suggestion for legal limit AM amp
> (was Heath Warrior as an AM amplifier)
>
>
> > On 1/17/2012 11:04 AM, Carl wrote:
> >> The T Bolt is a bit weak in the PS for extended old
> >> buzzard transmissions
> >> from what Ive heard on the air and read elsewhere.
> > Carl,
> >
> > Based on your amplifier experience, wonder what you think
> > about driving
> > linears with controlled-carrier AM exciters? I've not
> > tried it myself
> > but hear guys on the air all the time running rigs like
> > DX-60s,
> > FT-101-series, and even some riceboxes that seem to work
> > quite well.
> > The lower resting carrier level would seem to be a way of
> > getting some
> > good power out of the lower-rated linear amplifiers like
> > the Warrior.
> >
> > All I know is that the audio quality can be very good,
> > although it is
> > important to set the proper carrier and modulation levels.
> > Just
> > listening to these stations on AM nets, I can't tell the
> > difference vs.
> > high-level modulated stations. I'm guessing that a PEP
> > wattmeter would
> > be the best way to set up the combination to operate
> > within legal limits.
> >
> > 73, Bob W9RAN
> >
> I think the main advantage of a controlled carrier AM
> rig is that it _is_ compatible with linear amplifiers. This
> is because the _average_ level is low since it follows the
> modulation. Essentially, the rig is modulated nearly 100%
> all the time except for the residual carrier. The only
> problem I've observed with it is that the AVC in normal AM
> receivers (fast AVC) tends to follow the carrier and pumps
> unpleasantly. For an SSB receiver with slow AVC this is not
> so much of a problem. For older AM receivers using manual
> gain may result in better sound.
>
>
> --
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles
> WB6KBL
> dickburk at ix.netcom.com
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Heathkit mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/heathkit
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Heathkit at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list:
> http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Heathkit
mailing list