[Heathkit] How about the SB-220?

Mon Aug 24 21:32:55 EDT 2009

> Once, there was a big bang in the amp -- some say it would have been
> caused by a parasitic oscillation.  Rich Measures belongs to this 
school.

I know he does love to blame VHF parasitics, but Measures does 
acknowledge that there can be other causes of the "bang" heard but not 
seen.  I personally feel the most likely to be an internal arc (not 
that uncommon event in transmitting tubes), but other possibilities 
include little insects getting into a gap, dust plus moisture in a gap, 
and the like.

A glitch resistor in series with the B+ is good protection for all 
these events...

Steve WD8DAS

sbjohnston at aol.com
http://www.wd8das.net/
---------------------------------------------------------
Radio is your best entertainment value.
---------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Carl <km1h at jeremy.mv.com>
To: Mike Hyder --N4NT-- <Mike_N4NT at embarqmail.com>; 
mmoss at mindspring.com; Heathkit Reflector <heathkit at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sat, Aug 22, 2009 8:58 am
Subject: Re: [Heathkit] How about the SB-220?

My view based on close to 40 years experience with servicing the SB-220
family pus converting over 200 to 6M.

See below for my interjected comments.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Hyder --N4NT--" <Mike_N4NT at embarqmail.com>
To: <mmoss at mindspring.com>; "Heathkit Reflector" 
<heathkit at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Heathkit] How about the SB-220?

> Marvin, you're welcome.  I'm sending this to the reflector so as to 
expose
> my ideas to flying barbs.
>
> I'll give you my experiences briefly.  When the FCC ordered that amps 
no
> longer could cover 10 meters (approximately 1977), I ordered an 
SB-220
> kit.
>
> Once, there was a big bang in the amp -- some say it would have been
> caused
> by a parasitic oscillation.  Rich Measures belongs to this school.

Where he is a very small minority and has been proven to be wrong time 
and
again.

Common engineering sense as well as tube manufacturers realize that
transmitting tubes will arc internally. This is due to either 
outgassing,
grid alignment, or sharp points not caught in inspection. The cure is 
to
first accept this as a normal occurance and do what is necessary to 
minimize
the damage.

The most important step here is to remove RFC-2 and replace with a 
15-20 Ohm
25W real wirewound resistor. Do not use cement or aluminum encased 
versions.
This resistor acts as a HV current limiter and is not sacrificial...it
should survive an arc.
RFC-2 is also self resonant close to the tubes parasitic frequency and 
adds
to instability. The resistors resistance wire also kills any VHF that
reaches it.

 I
> installed new tubes (one was ruined by the bang) and installed 
parasitic
> suppressors -- NiChrome coils.  Measures sells them.  Look here and
> specify
> your amp model when ordering: http://www.somis.org/Price-Info.html

That site is good reading and mostly to see what not to do.

>
> I use Ten-Tec rigs and run 35-45 WPM CW.  My main consideration is 
that
> the
> transmit relay in the SB-220 presents over 100 VDC across the 
back-panel
> jack and current sufficient to cause pitting to the contacts in a
> transceiver's relay.

And totally destroys a SS switching transistor. The voltage is 
approximately
+125-130VDC.

You can buy a small circuit called the SK-220 Soft-Key
> for the Heathkit SB-220 or SB-221 from this website:
> http://www.harbachelectronics.com/main/page_products_sb220__sb221.html
> This is a very worthwhile modification.

I agree 100%

>
> They also sell a module called the SS-221 Soft-Start which I believe 
is
> NOT
> NEEDED AT ALL, don't waste your money (read about that on Measures' 
site).

Here we go again with the king of junk science. First of all the power
switch is not a common replacement item any longer. Secondly the inrush
currents effect on the switch depends upon where in the AC cycle it 
happens.
Since this is not a zero crossing controlled circuit it can be anywhere.
The Harbach circuit is good conceptually but uses cheap cement power
resistors which are known to fail. Replace them with real wirewounds.

>
> I have a full QSK amplifier but greatly prefer my SB-220.  Here's 
why:
> The
> Ten-Tec rigs have a drop-out delay on the relay which switches an
> amplifier
> to transmit.  That delay is to prevent the rapid clatter of the
> amplifier's
> relay.  But there is a most salutory effect to that.  When the 
amplifier
> switches to transmit, there is sufficient signal coupled from the 
antenna
> through the antenna relay and into the transceiver.  So when I'm 
working
> QSK
> at perhaps 45 WPM and start to transmit, my receiver becomes much
> quieter --
> but enough of the other guy's signal comes through for me to hear 
him,
> even
> if his signal is perhaps S4 or so (maybe much less) because the 
signal is
> still well above the noise level.  I keep my transceiver's drop-out 
delay
> set to maximum.

The stock relay is way too slow for QSK and can even hot switch using 
VOX on
CW or SSB. This is a major cause of arced bandswitches....not voodoo
parasitics. A speed step-up circuit could be used or use PTT or a foot
switch. If controlling with an old tube transmitter the sequencing is 
OK for
VOX. Some modern rigs have adjustable delays but you really need a 
scope to
verifiy sequencing. Many rice boxes come on with a full power spike 
which
raise havoc with many amps, not just a SB-220.

>
> With the age of the your amp, here's what I'd consider doing to it:
> First, remember that the 3-500 tubes must be operated vertically!  I'd
> remove the front spacers on the feet to make the amp sit level on the
> desk.

Since the fan also cools the filament pins below the chassis this may 
not be
a good idea. Pins have been known to overheat and melt their solder 
which
causes an open filament until repaired, and destroys the socket temper
resulting in poor tension.
Its the old cause and effect of making changes that have not been 
completely
thought out.

> a. I'd oil the fan motor as suggested by Rich Measures

Take it out, take it all apart, clean both the front and rear bearing
surfaces and relube with a good grade machine/electric motor oil. Its
extremely simple to do. Read the manual as to exactly where to mount 
the
blade. If using graphite tubes go for the Harbach high speed fan and 
learn
to live with the noise unless you want to install a 2 speed 
modification.
Leave the amp on for at least a minute after transmitting before 
powering
down.

> b. I'd install that SK-220 Soft-Key circuit.

See comments above

> c. If the electrolytics are original, I'd replace them.

The Cornell-Dublier 381LX series 330 uF 450V 105*C fits the original 
blocks
perfectly and adds a bit of dynamic regulation.

> d. I'd REPLACE the equalization / bleeder resistors across each
> electrolytic
> capacitor per Measures, whether or not I replaced the electrolytics!

I suggest 75K 3W MOX across new caps. Do not reduce the value for 
original
caps as their age and even initial tolerance could seriously unequalize
voltages.

All parts that Ive mentioned are regular stock at Mouser.

> e. I'd make sure I had installed the NiChrome parasitic suppressors 
from
> Measures.

Pure garbage. Instead use a pair of the same style 100 Ohm resistors in
parallel using the original coil if the original resistors have 
increased
more than 10% above 47 Ohms. RF and heat cooks carbon composition 
resistors,
when the value increases too much they no longer absorb the parasitic 
RF.
Ive also used a pair of 100 Ohm 5W MOX resistors (Mouser again) and had 
no
problem with the slight added inductance.

> f. I had trouble with the big zener diode used for PA bias.  The 
Harbach
> RM-220 Rectifier/Metering Board fixes this problem.

I prefer a string of robust 1N5408's for the bias. The 1N4007's on the
Harbach blow almost as easy as the zener. Haven heard of a 1N5408 
blowing in
the 25 years Ive used and recommended them.

The diodes in the stock board should be replaced by 1N5408's also. 
Drill out
the holes slightly to fit the thicker leads.

> g. I'd take Measures' advice about removing the interlock from inside 
the
> final cage.

Ive been doing that since the amp was first sold!

 and I'd use "Stove Black" or as he said, "black liquid shoe
> polish" to paint the inside of the final compartment (including the 
cover
> to
> same).

More pure voodo science.

> h. If I had lotsa money, I'd buy a spare fan & motor and a spare 
antenna
> relay (just in case).  I was stationed in Ethiopia for some three 
years
> and
> developed a great fondness for spares.

Fan motors are too low torque to fail but yes on the relay. Many have
already lost their flexible arm temper from use and RF heat.

>
> But my main points are these:
> Don't convert the amp to QSK.
> Do install an SK-220 circuit (or build your own circuit).
> Otherwise consider ALL of Measures' ideas.
>
> The SB-220 is a great amp.

Absolutely.

One other modification that may be a bit hard to source. Besides the 
reasons
already mentioned the bandswitch can arc due to high circulating RF due 
to
the shorted turn effect of the design. Again, no voodoo science 
parasitics
are involved. This can be snubbed by installing a 10-12pf 1000V silver 
mica
between the 20 and 80M contacts directly at the switch. It will affect 
the
Tune control by that much capacity at 10M so the coil spacing may have 
to be
stretched a very small amount. A 5Kv RF doorknob can also be used.  
Fair
Radio, SSN and others sources may have suitable caps.

Carl
KM1H
Amplifier Repairs and 6M conversions since 1964
National Radio 1963-69
Member of NCL-2000 Design Team

>
> 73, Mike N4NT
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marvin Moss" <mmoss at mindspring.com>
> To: "Mike Hyder --N4NT--" <Mike_N4NT at embarqmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 04:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [Heathkit] How about the SB-220?
>
>
>> That is a good one.
>> Thanks.
>> Marvin
>>
>>
>>> [Original Message]
>>> From: Mike Hyder --N4NT-- <Mike_N4NT at embarqmail.com>
>>> To: <mmoss at mindspring.com>
>>> Date: 8/21/2009 03:43:24 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Heathkit] How about the SB-220?
>>>
>>> Look here: http://www.somis.org/
>>>
>>> particularly here: http://www.somis.org/SB220ci.html
>>>
>>> 73, Mike N4NT
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Heathkit mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/heathkit
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Heathkit at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Heathkit mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/heathkit
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Heathkit at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html