[Heathkit] How about the SB-220?

[Paul Baldock]

At 09:31 AM 8/23/2009, you wrote:
>And the more important 3rd?

- 30dB down to -34dB

However I think the 5th is more important as it is out side the 
typical bandwidth and contributes the most to interference. The third 
contributes more to in band distortion


- Paul



>Carl
>KM1H
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Baldock" <pbaldock at verizon.net>
>To: "Carl" <km1h at jeremy.mv.com>; <heathkit at mailman.qth.net>
>Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 11:57 AM
>Subject: Re: [Heathkit] How about the SB-220?
>
>
>>At 08:26 AM 8/23/2009, Carl wrote:
>>
>>>Not all rigs show an IMD increase at reduced power., some actually 
>>>increase. What sort of levels do you see with a spectrum analyzer?
>>TS2000:
>>-50dB fifth order at 14.2MHz 100W PEP
>>-60dB fifth order at 14.2MHz 80W PEP
>>I don't have results recorded for 90W PEP 
>>______________________________________________________________
>>Heathkit mailing list
>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/heathkit
>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>Post: mailto:Heathkit at mailman.qth.net
>>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html