[Heathkit] Mohican BFO question, other things.
Edward B Richards
zuu6k at juno.com
Fri Jan 21 22:02:11 EST 2005
Phil;
The RF tuning should have prominent peaks. Is the correct transistor in
the RF amp stage ?
73, Ed Richards K6UUZ
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:33:48 -0000 "Philip Atchley"
<beaconeer at sbcglobal.net> writes:
> Hi,
>
> In working on this Mohican and going through it thoroughly I've
> found an
> anomaly in the BFO circuit (varactor tuned).
>
> 1. The schematic (BAMA download) shows resistor R91, 1.5K between
> the
> low side of the Pot and ground. On this set the low side of the Pot
>
> goes directly to ground, no R91. Was this a design change or did
> somebody do it themselves, perhaps to get additional BFO range? The
>
> problem I have with it is this allows the Varactor to have "Zero"
> bias
> on it, and it could then act as a "rectifier" of the generated
> signal
> Voltage, instead of a capacitor as it's supposed to be. It just
> doesn't
> seem "right".
>
> 2. The tuning of the antenna coils/trimmers, antenna tune control
> seems
> to have very little response. The RF amplifier is now working after
>
> replacing it's RF amplifier, but the tuning is non critical/almost
> non
> existent. Is this a very "Low Q" circuit and just not responsive or
>
> should I be looking for a problem component/wiring?
>
> 73 de Phil, KO6BB
> 991 Different NDB's heard to date.
>
> http://www.geocities.com/ko6bb/
> Merced, Central California, 37.3N 120.48W CM97sh
>
> _______________________________________________
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
> $$ See the vintage area on the HCI web site - http://www.w9wze.org
> $$
> Heathkit mailing list
> Heathkit at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/heathkit
>
More information about the Heathkit
mailing list