[HBR] My approach to the HBR... Suggestions?
Hopperdhh at aol.com
Hopperdhh at aol.com
Sat Sep 13 10:53:22 EDT 2008
Pete,
I have never liked audio derived AGC. As you tune through zero beat on CW
the gain goes up and down. Pumping problems are hard to control. You will
not be able to achieve the kind of attack times you can with IF derived AGC.
You may need a separate IF amp for the AGC to help keep out the BFO signal.
At any rate take special care to isolate the BFO. I built an SSB transceiver
once that had excellent AGC characteristics after studying the time constants
(different for RF vs. IF) used in the Drake TR4.
Keep in mind that the 85 Kc ARC-5 IF cans are relatively low Q -- about 60
if I recall. Bob Drake was my hero when it came to filter design. The Drake
2-B has only 4 tuned circuits at 50 Kc, but the Q must be pretty high. There
are cores available today to take that approach, but the ARC-5 coils will
work. Since you have them, and have space for them, give 'em a try.
I like your idea of using more tuned circuits and sweep tuning them. You
might also try LTSpice (free download from www.linear.com) to model the filter.
Its easy to try different coupling circuits and values once you have
measured the L and Q of one of the coils. I would assume 1 megohm for the input
and output tube loads.
You will probably need to remove turns from the 1415 Kc cans to move them up
to 1600. You may not need 4 cans at 1600, I would breadboard up a one (or
two) tube test circuit to see what kind of response two cans have at two times
85 Kc away from the peak. (LTSpice could be used here too!) Also, using
1605, or 1655, etc., may be a better choice to reduce interference from BC
stations.
Best of luck -- have fun,
Dan K9WEK
**************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog,
plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com.
(http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)
More information about the HBR
mailing list