[HBR] Navy Guy and (slight) progress report
waltah at ntelos.net
waltah at ntelos.net
Sat Jun 24 15:00:54 EDT 2006
Tom wrote:
> Thanks for the compliment, Kees (hope it was one).
>
> Tom - WØEAJ - former RMC, USN
HEY! I thought that was for me! <G>
I guess my Navy service is the reason I like the gray paint. It's
certainly the reason for my enduring affection for one of the biggest
wastes of government money ever -- the RCA SRR-11, 12, 13
series of receivers. A much modified SRR-13 is the only general
coverage receiver here -- the R-390A's have stayed ahead of my
price range for three decades now.
Study the SRR-13 closely and you'll cease to wonder why RCA is
now a subsidiary of GE.
I've had to switch to darker grays though -- can't find spray cans of
the 70's Ford 'dove gray' any more. The few finished projects
these days look more Canadian military than U.S. Navy.
I continue chewing on the General Coverage HBR project. The 80-
40 meter band imaging receiver (six tubes plus rectifier, half lattice
crystal filter, push-pull 12AT7 mixer) turned out so well that it
inspires use as a tunable IF in a set along the lines of the G2DAF
Mk II. I will use a ladder filter rather than the 2-crystal half lattice --
squarer sides and higher ultimate rejection.
With the IF section needing only the tuning range to be tweeked,
the project SOUNDS simple, and I'm hoping that at some point it
will be. But details remain elusive.
The plan is to take the 120 crystals of the BC-1335 WW-II portable
FM set, 5675-8650 kcs (25 kcs spacing) and multiply the
frequencies x10 to give 120 frequencies 56.75-86.50 Mcs.
Subtract 49.2 Mcs yielding 7.55-37.30 Mcs by 250 kcs steps.
Adding a tunable oscillator 1.704-1.454 Mcs to a fixed IF of 4.096
Mcs (the ladder filter with 4.096 microprocessor clock crystals)
gives a tunable IF of 5.800-5.550 Mcs. The difference between
that and the synthesized band crystal frequency is the tuning
range for the band: for the lowest band, it's 7.550 Mcs - 5.550-
5.800 Mcs = 2.0 - 1.75 Mcs.
The 1st mixer input must be tuned to cover the whole range; I plan
three ranges, roughly 1.75-5.5-16-32 Mcs. Each encompasses
two 'real' ham bands and there'll be two crystal sockets selected
by the bandswitch for each, plus a single socket on the front panel
to allow any one other 250 kcs segment to be covered. The
bandswitch will be marked 1 A, 1 B, 1 external, 2 A, 2 B, 2
external, 3 A, 3 B, 3 external. Extra crystals store in a drawer
under the receiver cabinet. I have a nice nearly complete set and
quite a bit of junk.
Somewhat along the lines of the Collins S-line. In theory I could
use an overtone scheme for the crystals but it would have to be 5th
overtone x2 to get the x10 and using WW-II fundamental crystals
on 5th overtone and dealing with the displacement of the 5th
overtone from the 5th harmonic of the marked frequency,
discouraged me. Overtones from overtone crystals are fine but
getting them from fundamental cuts can be tricky, unstable, and
require slightly oddball tuning settings -- not good for a control
that's ganged.
The synthesizer must be tuned; that's another knob and half or
more the sections on the bandswitch. I'm hoping to gang only two
tuned circuits in the synthesizer -- maybe the x10 frequency can
be generated with a single envelope triode-pentode or an ECO-type
circuit with the crystal frequency untuned and the plate tuned.
Then only the x10 - 49.2 Mcs mixer output (7.550-37.30 Mcs) has
to be ganged with that. That would be two tuned circuits with three
coils and a couple of trimmer caps each. A little messy but not
too bad.
This does not sound terribly complex -- an extra mixer plus three
tubes to generate the crystal mixing frequency. However more
plate current is required so I'll use two 17H3 (miniature damper
diode) rectifiers instead of the 35W4 of the 80-40 design. A
crystal calibrator is also needed to align things on each band --
another tube. So six tubes for the IF section, four more in the
converter section (1st mixer and crystal synthesizer), a calibrator,
and two rectifiers -- 13 tubes.
The calibrator will tweek the 49.2 Mcs crystal oscillator. Tuning
range may be an issue -- crystal freq. errors of a couple kc are
common and they are multiplied by ten.
The mechanicals are more challenging than I expected. A general
coverage receiver of this type cannot dodge all internal spurs just
by careful choice of conversion schemes. I think I have put the
worst of them outside the six real ham bands but the rest must be
minimized by filtering (fancy/numerous tuned circuits are not
popular in a simple home design), by use of balanced mixers
(complexity takes off) and shielding.
But better shielding means boxing stuff up, while bandswitching
three tubes and tuning a total of five air variables (1st mixer input,
synthesizer, LO, calibrator, and VXO BFO) means some shafting
must be fitted in. Then there are the crystal sockets/switching
that go with the bandswitch.
Two boxes, both below the chassis: One housing the 1st mixer
and calibrator, the other with the LO/2nd mixer. Boxes take up
space by forcing space-wasting arrangement of parts. But they
stiffen the chassis which is particularly useful for the LO. With
thin shims under, the Bud open side boxes will go in a Bud
chassis of the same nominal height with the flanges level with the
sides, allowing a single flat bottom plate.
The sheilding also bites on front panel space -- and this is a
receiver with more than the usual number of knobs. I had to go to
a wider chassis (14") with a 16" panel because so much was taken
up by the LO/2nd mixer box and LO dial that there wasn't enough
room on the chassis and panel I had planned.
I think the front panel is going to be a bit untidy. There's just not
the freedom there that you'd like.
A freebee discovered on the 80-40M design is that you can put
push-pull mixers driven from a very low impedence mixing
frequency source on the AGC line without trouble. (Mixer drive for
that set is taken across 0.01 mfd caps right into the cathodes.)
The oscillator must develop a lot of power -- ~80V p-p on the plates
of the 80-40M design -- but with careful shielding and filtering,
chassis currents minimized, and in a tight box, it may be okay.
The LO tunes in the opposite direction from the receiver so it's
tweets will go by quickly.
The front end is in another box and push-pull signal feed will also
be favorable. And LO harmonics are not in the real ham bands.
(If it has only ever been denominated in mHz, it is not 'real.')
The 80-40M set is as flat AGC-wise as you could want, and the GC
one can have both mixers on the line. This helps the 'working'
dynamic range even more and simplifies things considerably in an
IF section using sharp-cutoff tubes and plate detectors.
There seem not to be any remote or semi-remote cutoff tubes in a
pentode-triode combination. I'm using 7HG8's for IF stages and a
few other jobs.
There's way too much other stuff going on here; I don't ever work on
the set in a concentrated way, but I'm still in thinking things
through mode with parts sitting on the chassis on the kitchen
counter, so that's not a big loss.
Huh? Oh, next to the scope. Isn't that logical?
Walt Hutchens
KJ4KV
More information about the HBR
mailing list